AS20249 Jefferies LLC 🇺🇸 US
Announcing 53 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
53
66,560 (260 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
0
-
Upstreams
20
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS20249
- Name
- Jefferies LLC
- Organisation
- Jefferies LLC
- Country
- 🇺🇸 US
- RIR
- ARIN
- Allocated
- 2019-07-08
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) | 🇺🇸 US | 71,422 | 2,088 | 160 | CAIDA |
| AS3257 GTT Communications Inc. | 🇺🇸 US | 63,602 | 1,787 | 52 | CAIDA |
| AS2914 NTT America, Inc. | 🇺🇸 US | 55,552 | 1,476 | 104 | CAIDA |
| AS6461 Zayo Bandwidth | 🇺🇸 US | 51,746 | 212 | 46 | CAIDA |
| AS3491 PCCW Global (HK) Ltd. | ðŸ‡ðŸ‡° HK | 51,096 | 532 | 41 | CAIDA |
| AS8220 COLT | 🇬🇧 GB | 46,136 | 155 | 28 | CAIDA |
| AS9498 Bharti Airtel Ltd. | 🇮🇳 IN | 26,474 | 5,121 | 41 | CAIDA |
| AS7018 AT&T Enterprises, LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 25,881 | 629 | 89 | CAIDA |
| AS4755 TATA Communications (formerly VSNL) | 🇮🇳 IN | 25,561 | 2,352 | 1 | CAIDA |
| AS1828 PacketFabric / Unitas Global | 🇺🇸 US | 20,627 | 122 | 111 | CAIDA |
| AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc. | 🇺🇸 US | 19,918 | 2,402 | 1,034 | CAIDA |
| AS15830 Equinix, Inc. | 🇳🇱 NL | 18,504 | 1,081 | 96 | CAIDA |
| AS21859 Zenlayer Inc | 🇺🇸 US | 3,732 | 1,683 | 9 | CAIDA |
| AS46887 Zayo (fka. Crown Castle) | 🇺🇸 US | 1,413 | 798 | 11 | CAIDA |
| AS2686 AT&T Enterprises, LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 283 | 172 | 43 | CAIDA |
| AS10913 Unitas Global | 🇺🇸 US | 57 | 34 | 72 | CAIDA |
| AS13789 Unitas Global | 🇺🇸 US | 49 | 89 | 61 | CAIDA |
| AS15570 PACKETFABRIC (UK) LTD | 🇬🇧 GB | 22 | 16 | 202 | CAIDA |
| AS17675 PacketFabric (Japan) Co., Ltd. | 🇯🇵 JP | 13 | 16 | 49 | CAIDA |
| AS133012 Cocoa Oriental Network Limited | ðŸ‡ðŸ‡° HK | 4 | 14 | 8 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
No peers observed at the collectors.
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
No downstreams observed at the collectors.
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.