AS202782 Yaoheng Digital (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd. 🇨🇳 CN
Announcing 2 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
0
-
IPv6 prefixes
2
32 × /48
Upstreams
2
transit providers observed
Peers
7
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
2
transit customers observed
Customer cone
2
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS202782
- Name
- Yaoheng Digital (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.
- Organisation
- EverLink
- Country
- 🇨🇳 CN
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2025-12-16
- Network type
- Content
- Traffic levels
- 20-50Gbps
- Scope
- Global
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS202782:AS-EVERLINK
- Website
- https://net.68cloud.net
- PeeringDB
- net/41113
- Exchanges
- 1
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS3204 xTom OU | 🇪🇪 EE | 13 | 0 | 91 | CAIDA |
| AS56662 Marcin Gondek | 🇵🇱 PL | 0 | 0 | 9 | inferred |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 56,548 | 236 | 224 | CAIDA |
| AS31500 Global Network Management Inc | 🇦🇬 AG | 20,855 | 40 | 2 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 20,534 | 45 | 11 | CAIDA |
| AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG | 🇩🇪 DE | 19,954 | 48 | 24 | CAIDA |
| AS60539 Huicast Telecom Limited | 🇭🇰 HK | 277 | 1 | 13 | CAIDA |
| AS25091 IP-Max SA | 🇨🇭 CH | 196 | 25 | 1 | CAIDA |
| AS206499 LOCIX LIMITED | 🇬🇧 GB | 4 | 3 | 2 | CAIDA |
| AS401753 BIXCE Inc | 🇻🇬 VG | 2 | 1 | 21 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS44324 MoeDove LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 37 | 4 | 26 | inferred |
| AS199310 XIN BING XIAN | 🇨🇳 CN | 0 | 1 | 270 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.