AS203314 HATS NETWORK INC. 🇨🇦 CA
Announcing 25 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
0
-
IPv6 prefixes
25
309 × /48
Upstreams
12
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS203314
- Name
- HATS NETWORK INC.
- Organisation
- HATS NETWORK
- Country
- 🇨🇦 CA
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2022-08-16
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 100-200Gbps
- Scope
- Global
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS203314:AS-HATS
- Website
- https://hatsnet.io/?p
- Looking glass
- https://bgp.he.net/lg/203314
- PeeringDB
- net/30755
- Exchanges
- 21
- Facilities
- 9
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 53,567 | 235 | 18 | inferred |
| AS20473 The Constant Company, LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 17,248 | 1,854 | 4 | inferred |
| AS52025 ParadoxNetworks Limited | 🇬🇧 GB | 15,235 | 15 | 102 | inferred |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,747 | 45 | 6 | inferred |
| AS51847 Nearoute Limited | 🇭🇰 HK | 89 | 59 | 189 | inferred |
| AS917 Misaka Network, Inc. | 🇺🇸 US | 87 | 29 | 191 | inferred |
| AS44324 MoeDove LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 28 | 4 | 200 | inferred |
| AS7720 Skywolf Technology LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 9 | 4 | 58 | inferred |
| AS47778 Sunoaki Network LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 0 | 43 | inferred |
| AS201217 RADISHCLOUD TECHNOLOGY LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 8 | 21 | inferred |
| AS38855 STUIX Route Servers | 🇹🇼 TW | 0 | 0 | 6 | inferred |
| AS205794 JINZE YANG | 🇨🇳 CN | 0 | 0 | 4 | inferred |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
No peers observed at the collectors.
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
No downstreams observed at the collectors.
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.