AS203779 NORDFIBER AS 🇳🇴 NO
Announcing 11 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
6
2,816 (11 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
5
12 × /32
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
5
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
4
transit customers observed
Customer cone
6
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS203779
- Name
- NORDFIBER AS
- Organisation
- Nordfiber
- Country
- 🇳🇴 NO
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2015-10-30
- Network type
- NSP
- Traffic levels
- 100-200Gbps
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- RIPE::AS-NORDFIBER
- Website
- http://www.nordfiber.no
- PeeringDB
- net/12847
- Exchanges
- 2
- Facilities
- 4
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) | 🇺🇸 US | 72,220 | 2,074 | 229 | CAIDA |
| AS2116 GLOBALCONNECT AS | 🇳🇴 NO | 118 | 171 | 311 | CAIDA |
| AS2119 Telenor Norge AS | 🇳🇴 NO | 81 | 95 | 930 | CAIDA |
| AS25400 Telia Norge AS | 🇳🇴 NO | 59 | 128 | 42 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 56,518 | 236 | 543 | CAIDA |
| AS33891 Core-Backbone GmbH | 🇩🇪 DE | 28,628 | 1 | 44 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 20,687 | 45 | 25 | CAIDA |
| AS56655 Gigahost AS | 🇳🇴 NO | 20,030 | 34 | 65 | CAIDA |
| AS50304 Blix Solutions AS | 🇳🇴 NO | 34 | 97 | 129 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS202204 TENEO DIGITAL AS | 🇳🇴 NO | 2 | 31 | 926 | CAIDA |
| AS200665 Hammerfest Energi Bredbaand AS | 🇳🇴 NO | 0 | 9 | 488 | CAIDA |
| AS201596 3NET AS | 🇳🇴 NO | 0 | 8 | 266 | CAIDA |
| AS207464 Varanger KraftFiber AS | 🇳🇴 NO | 0 | 5 | 217 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.