AS204957 ROUTE 95 LLC 🇺🇸 US
Announcing 159 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
140
41,728 (163 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
19
15 × /32
Upstreams
11
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
5
transit customers observed
Customer cone
9
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS204957
- Name
- ROUTE 95 LLC
- Organisation
- GREEN FLOID
- Country
- 🇺🇸 US
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2017-11-30
- Scope
- Not Disclosed
- PeeringDB
- net/36954
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS9002 RETN Limited | 🇬🇧 GB | 51,577 | 14 | 608 | CAIDA |
| AS9009 M247 Europe SRL | 🇷🇴 RO | 213 | 4,430 | 400 | CAIDA |
| AS46562 Performive LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 197 | 234 | 519 | CAIDA |
| AS23033 Wowrack.com | 🇺🇸 US | 98 | 34 | 73 | CAIDA |
| AS26548 PureVoltage Hosting Inc. | 🇺🇸 US | 45 | 135 | 344 | CAIDA |
| AS29222 Infomaniak Network SA | 🇨🇭 CH | 44 | 31 | 487 | CAIDA |
| AS24971 MasterDC s.r.o. | 🇨🇿 CZ | 19 | 33 | 444 | CAIDA |
| AS200088 Artnet Sp. z o.o. | 🇵🇱 PL | 16 | 39 | 136 | CAIDA |
| AS32181 GigeNET | 🇺🇸 US | 13 | 39 | 113 | CAIDA |
| AS8254 GREEN FLOID LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 11 | 11 | 4,196 | CAIDA |
| AS64010 BasicBrix LLP | 🇸🇬 SG | 10 | 12 | 76 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
No peers observed at the collectors.
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS29067 Hostmaster LLC | 🇺🇦 UA | 3 | 7 | 38 | CAIDA |
| AS216129 SEBEK sp. z o.o | 🇵🇱 PL | 2 | 25 | 84 | CAIDA |
| AS202051 NETGRID HOST LTD | 🇬🇧 GB | 0 | 29 | 378 | CAIDA |
| AS199058 SERVA ONE LTD | 🇬🇧 GB | 0 | 16 | 213 | CAIDA |
| AS209260 SERVA ONE LTD | 🇬🇧 GB | 0 | 2 | 42 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.