AS205098 Cloud Gateway Limited 🇬🇧 GB
Announcing 7 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
7
3,840 (15 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
0
-
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
8
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
1
transit customers observed
Customer cone
2
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS205098
- Name
- Cloud Gateway Limited
- Organisation
- Cloud Gateway
- Country
- 🇬🇧 GB
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2017-11-08
- Network type
- NSP
- Traffic levels
- 1-5Gbps
- Scope
- South America
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- RIPE::AS205098:AS-CLOUDGATEWAY
- Website
- https://www.cloudgateway.co.uk/
- PeeringDB
- net/17892
- Exchanges
- 2
- Facilities
- 5
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6461 Zayo Bandwidth | 🇺🇸 US | 57,084 | 229 | 39 | CAIDA |
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 56,703 | 236 | 305 | CAIDA |
| AS51945 ENLINK LTD | 🇬🇧 GB | 13 | 5 | 18 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | 🇧🇫 BF | 26,483 | 64 | 7 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 20,600 | 45 | 7 | CAIDA |
| AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG | 🇩🇪 DE | 20,026 | 48 | 28 | CAIDA |
| AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. | 🇵🇭 PH | 242 | 567 | 7 | CAIDA |
| AS50304 Blix Solutions AS | 🇳🇴 NO | 34 | 97 | 7 | CAIDA |
| AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch | 🇦🇹 AT | 15 | 8 | 7 | CAIDA |
| AS48185 team.blue NV | 🇧🇪 BE | 14 | 1 | 7 | CAIDA |
| AS50300 CustodianDC Limited | 🇬🇧 GB | 9 | 39 | 7 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS211760 Cleveland Clinic London Ltd | 🇬🇧 GB | 0 | 2 | 96 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.