AS205111 ZOHO Corporation B.V 🇳🇱 NL

Announcing 37 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
37
12,800 (50 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
0
-
Upstreams
10
transit providers observed
Peers
9
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
1
transit customers observed
Customer cone
2
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS205111
Name
ZOHO Corporation B.V
Organisation
ZOHO Corporation B.V
Country
🇳🇱 NL
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2017-11-07

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

31 valid (83.8%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 6 no ROA (16.2%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS1299 Arelion (fka. Telia Carrier) 🇸🇪 SE 68,614 133 217 CAIDA
AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC 🇺🇸 US 65,732 4,017 117 CAIDA
AS6461 Zayo Bandwidth 🇺🇸 US 50,439 213 470 CAIDA
AS8966 Etisalat (E&) 🇦🇪 AE 43,232 49 45 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions 🇧🇫 BF 21,673 64 1 inferred
AS35819 Etihad Etisalat (Mobily) 🇸🇦 SA 20,413 685 213 CAIDA
AS35753 Etihad Salam Telecom CJSC 🇸🇦 SA 19,807 366 39 CAIDA
AS15830 Equinix, Inc. 🇳🇱 NL 18,311 1,082 336 CAIDA
AS42156 GNX B.V. 🇳🇱 NL 630 11 55 CAIDA
AS198949 Radware 🇮🇱 IL 586 236 85 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 53,577 235 5 CAIDA
AS31500 Global Network Management Inc 🇦🇬 AG 21,060 40 1 CAIDA
AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG 🇩🇪 DE 15,455 48 4 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 4,781 45 1 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. 🇵🇭 PH 270 567 1 CAIDA
AS50304 Blix Solutions AS 🇳🇴 NO 34 97 2 CAIDA
AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch 🇦🇹 AT 15 8 1 CAIDA
AS48185 team.blue NV 🇧🇪 BE 14 1 1 CAIDA
AS50300 CustodianDC Limited 🇬🇧 GB 9 39 1 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS397849 ZOHO 🇺🇸 US 0 17 32 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.