AS205369 LI YIRAN π¨π³ CN
Announcing 6 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
0
-
IPv6 prefixes
6
99 Γ /48
Upstreams
11
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
1
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS205369
- Name
- LI YIRAN
- Organisation
- iYoRoy-Network
- Country
- π¨π³ CN
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2025-08-15
- Network type
- Educational/Research
- Traffic levels
- 1-5Gbps
- Scope
- Global
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS205369:AS-IYOROY-NET
- Website
- https://www.iyoroy.cn
- PeeringDB
- net/40075
- Exchanges
- 13
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | πΊπΈ US | 53,055 | 235 | 248 | inferred |
| AS20473 The Constant Company, LLC | πΊπΈ US | 17,619 | 1,718 | 30 | inferred |
| AS34927 iFog GmbH | π¨π CH | 15,629 | 38 | 48 | inferred |
| AS52025 ParadoxNetworks Limited | π¬π§ GB | 15,524 | 13 | 6 | inferred |
| AS212895 Johannes Ernst | π©πͺ DE | 57 | 5 | 1 | inferred |
| AS44324 MoeDove LLC | πΊπΈ US | 29 | 4 | 2 | inferred |
| AS47272 HYEHOST LLC | πΊπΈ US | 17 | 7 | 3 | inferred |
| AS41051 Freetransit Project (Openfactory GmbH) | π¨π CH | 14 | 0 | 6 | inferred |
| AS199829 Akronic Network LTDA | π§π· BR | 9 | 5 | 2 | inferred |
| AS35708 4b42 UG | π©πͺ DE | 0 | 0 | 4 | inferred |
| AS205794 JINZE YANG | π¨π³ CN | 0 | 0 | 2 | inferred |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
No peers observed at the collectors.
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS197817 Yunxiao Bai | π¨π³ CN | 0 | 1 | 152 | inferred |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.