AS205847 GoFibre Holdings Limited 🇬🇧 GB

Announcing 17 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
7
2,560 (10 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
10
9,217 × /48
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
13
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS205847
Name
GoFibre Holdings Limited
Organisation
GoFibre
Country
🇬🇧 GB
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2020-04-02
Network type
Network Services
Traffic levels
50-100Gbps
Scope
Not Disclosed
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-GOFIBRE
PeeringDB
net/28130
Exchanges
2
Facilities
4

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

16 valid (94.1%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 1 no ROA (5.9%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC 🇺🇸 US 65,707 4,016 74 CAIDA
AS9002 RETN Limited 🇬🇧 GB 50,558 19 2 inferred
AS6461 Zayo Bandwidth 🇺🇸 US 50,406 213 467 CAIDA
AS213241 TECHIT.BE SRL 🇧🇪 BE 0 14 1 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 53,561 235 28 CAIDA
AS31500 Global Network Management Inc 🇦🇬 AG 21,005 40 3 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions 🇧🇫 BF 20,784 64 3 CAIDA
AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG 🇩🇪 DE 15,478 48 14 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 4,776 45 4 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. 🇵🇭 PH 268 567 3 CAIDA
AS29075 IELO-LIAZO SERVICES SAS 🇫🇷 FR 200 23 3 CAIDA
AS25091 IP-Max SA 🇨🇭 CH 170 25 1 CAIDA
AS12779 IT.Gate S.p.A. 🇮🇹 IT 76 25 3 CAIDA
AS50304 Blix Solutions AS 🇳🇴 NO 33 97 6 CAIDA
AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch 🇦🇹 AT 15 8 5 CAIDA
AS48185 team.blue NV 🇧🇪 BE 14 1 5 CAIDA
AS50300 CustodianDC Limited 🇬🇧 GB 9 39 4 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.