AS205915 Pinkroccade HealthCare B.V. πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL

Announcing 6 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
5
7,680 (30 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 Γ— /48
Upstreams
5
transit providers observed
Peers
9
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS205915
Name
Pinkroccade HealthCare B.V.
Organisation
Pinkroccade HealthCare
Country
πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2017-05-08
Network type
Network Services
Traffic levels
10-20Gbps
Scope
Europe
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-PINKROCCADE
PeeringDB
net/26595
Exchanges
1
Facilities
3

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

6 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS15830 Equinix, Inc. πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 18,172 1,082 42 CAIDA
AS24785 Joint Transit (Broadband Hosting B.V.) πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 1,079 21 79 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. πŸ‡΅πŸ‡­ PH 268 567 4 inferred
AS8455 atom86 BV πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 244 22 64 CAIDA
AS29632 Netassist International EOOD πŸ‡§πŸ‡¬ BG 42 0 2 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 53,567 235 25 CAIDA
AS20485 TransTeleCom JSC πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 28,120 85 3 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions πŸ‡§πŸ‡« BF 21,513 64 3 CAIDA
AS50673 Serverius Holding B.V. πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 15,950 130 4 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 4,747 45 4 CAIDA
AS6696 VERIXI SA πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺ BE 144 49 3 CAIDA
AS48185 team.blue NV πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺ BE 14 1 4 CAIDA
AS204092 Association GRIFON πŸ‡«πŸ‡· FR 10 2 4 CAIDA
AS3333 Reseaux IP Europeens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC) πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 0 7 4 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.