AS206521 Technoberg Beheer B.V. πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL

Announcing 10 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
7
1,792 (7 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
3
3 Γ— /32
Upstreams
5
transit providers observed
Peers
11
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS206521
Name
Technoberg Beheer B.V.
Organisation
Technoberg Beheer B.V.
Country
πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2017-01-02
Network type
Network Services
Traffic levels
10-20Gbps
Scope
Europe
Peering policy
No
IRR as-set
AS206521:AS-TECHNOBERG
PeeringDB
net/12750
Exchanges
3
Facilities
2

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

10 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS20562 Open Peering (Broadband Hosting B.V.) πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 3,615 0 98 CAIDA
AS24785 Joint Transit (Broadband Hosting B.V.) πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 1,346 21 3 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. πŸ‡΅πŸ‡­ PH 239 582 3 inferred
AS49127 Asimo Networks B.V. πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 202 10 180 CAIDA
AS29632 Netassist International EOOD πŸ‡§πŸ‡¬ BG 54 0 3 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 56,746 237 46 CAIDA
AS20485 JSC TransTeleCom πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί RU 30,237 85 7 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 23,796 45 10 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions πŸ‡§πŸ‡« BF 23,545 64 10 CAIDA
AS34927 iFog GmbH πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ CH 20,082 40 7 CAIDA
AS6696 VERIXI SA πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺ BE 189 49 7 CAIDA
AS58057 Securebit AG πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ CH 20 13 10 CAIDA
AS48185 team.blue NV πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺ BE 14 1 10 CAIDA
AS204092 Association GRIFON πŸ‡«πŸ‡· FR 10 2 10 CAIDA
AS3333 Reseaux IP Europeens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC) πŸ‡³πŸ‡± NL 0 7 10 CAIDA
AS202365 Chronos πŸ‡ΉπŸ‡· TR 0 4 7 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.