AS206804 EstNOC OU 🇪🇪 EE

Announcing 70 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
58
15,104 (59 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
12
777 × /48
Upstreams
18
transit providers observed
Peers
2
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS206804
Name
EstNOC OU
Organisation
EstNOC
Country
🇪🇪 EE
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2016-11-03
Network type
Enterprise
Scope
Global
Peering policy
Selective
IRR as-set
AS206804:AS-ALL
PeeringDB
net/23676
Facilities
30

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

59 valid (84.3%) 1 invalid (1.4%) 10 no ROA (14.3%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) 🇺🇸 US 70,916 2,084 497 CAIDA
AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC 🇺🇸 US 65,589 3,985 80 CAIDA
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 52,953 235 144 CAIDA
AS9002 RETN Limited 🇬🇧 GB 50,717 18 354 CAIDA
AS3491 PCCW Global (HK) Ltd. 🇭🇰 HK 50,472 532 164 CAIDA
AS15830 Equinix, Inc. 🇳🇱 NL 18,522 1,081 32 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 5,031 45 169 CAIDA
AS29467 LUXNETWORK S.A. 🇱🇺 LU 504 21 281 CAIDA
AS1257 Tele2 Sverige AB 🇪🇺 EU 404 381 227 CAIDA
AS8866 Vivacom Bulgaria EAD 🇧🇬 BG 178 1,010 86 CAIDA
AS42708 Glesys AB 🇸🇪 SE 106 211 82 CAIDA
AS198477 TI SPARKLE GREECE SA 🇬🇷 GR 37 15 186 inferred
AS23930 VITRO INC. 🇵🇭 PH 25 90 84 CAIDA
AS60695 NETRONIK sp. z o.o. 🇵🇱 PL 15 4 46 CAIDA
AS56704 Farice ehf 🇮🇸 IS 13 3 118 CAIDA
AS38949 Trestel SK, a.s. 🇸🇰 SK 11 3 92 CAIDA
AS28886 RETN Latvia 🇬🇧 GB 9 1 3 CAIDA
AS41828 Telemach Slovenija d.o.o. 🇸🇮 SI 3 5 157 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS20485 TransTeleCom JSC 🇷🇺 RU 28,211 85 1 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. 🇵🇭 PH 272 567 1 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.