AS20681 Saxo Bank A/S 🇩🇰 DK

Announcing 9 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
8
4,608 (18 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 × /32
Upstreams
6
transit providers observed
Peers
12
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS20681
Name
Saxo Bank A/S
Organisation
Saxo Bank
Country
🇩🇰 DK
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2001-05-07
Network type
Content
Traffic levels
100-1000Mbps
Scope
Global
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-SAXOBANK
PeeringDB
net/6893
Exchanges
1
Facilities
4

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

9 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS3257 GTT Communications Inc. 🇺🇸 US 63,031 1,809 27 CAIDA
AS9002 RETN Limited 🇬🇧 GB 50,049 18 2 inferred
AS8220 COLT 🇬🇧 GB 44,505 155 23 inferred
AS32787 Akamai (Prolexic) 🇺🇸 US 7,211 308 258 CAIDA
AS3292 TDC Holding A/S 🇩🇰 DK 140 173 9 CAIDA
AS213241 TECHIT.BE SRL 🇧🇪 BE 0 14 1 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 52,966 235 18 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions 🇧🇫 BF 21,505 64 4 CAIDA
AS31500 Global Network Management Inc 🇦🇬 AG 20,967 40 2 CAIDA
AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG 🇩🇪 DE 15,431 48 10 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 4,727 45 3 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. 🇵🇭 PH 274 567 3 CAIDA
AS29075 IELO-LIAZO SERVICES SAS 🇫🇷 FR 201 23 3 CAIDA
AS12779 IT.Gate S.p.A. 🇮🇹 IT 76 25 2 CAIDA
AS50304 Blix Solutions AS 🇳🇴 NO 34 103 4 CAIDA
AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch 🇦🇹 AT 15 8 3 CAIDA
AS48185 team.blue NV 🇧🇪 BE 14 1 3 CAIDA
AS50300 CustodianDC Limited 🇬🇧 GB 9 39 3 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.