AS207203 TIMEWARP IT Consulting GmbH 🇦🇹 AT
Announcing 17 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
15
8,192 (32 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
2
16 × /32
Upstreams
5
transit providers observed
Peers
5
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
3
transit customers observed
Customer cone
4
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS207203
- Name
- TIMEWARP IT Consulting GmbH
- Organisation
- TIMEWARP IT Consulting
- Country
- 🇦🇹 AT
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2016-08-11
- Scope
- Europe
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- RIPE::AS-TIMEWARP-SET
- Website
- http://www.timewarp.at
- PeeringDB
- net/15741
- Exchanges
- 1
- Facilities
- 3
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS1299 Arelion (fka. Telia Carrier) | 🇸🇪 SE | 68,747 | 132 | 214 | CAIDA |
| AS2914 NTT America, Inc. | 🇺🇸 US | 54,858 | 1,607 | 43 | CAIDA |
| AS5405 Inter.link GmbH | 🇩🇪 DE | 28,550 | 11 | 374 | CAIDA |
| AS47147 Anexia Cloud Solutions GmbH | 🇦🇹 AT | 123 | 8 | 133 | CAIDA |
| AS31543 myNet GmbH | 🇦🇹 AT | 13 | 26 | 1 | inferred |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 53,695 | 236 | 60 | CAIDA |
| AS3303 Swisscom (Schweiz) AG | 🇨🇭 CH | 20,310 | 345 | 1 | CAIDA |
| AS8218 Zayo Europe | 🇫🇷 FR | 341 | 19 | 1 | CAIDA |
| AS15935 ha-vel internet s.r.o. | 🇨🇿 CZ | 33 | 13 | 17 | CAIDA |
| AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch | 🇦🇹 AT | 15 | 8 | 16 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS215406 PaymentPass Inc. | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 2 | 86 | CAIDA |
| AS209942 AIRGSM PTE. LTD | 🇸🇬 SG | 0 | 4 | 43 | CAIDA |
| AS51767 Johanniter-Unfall-Hilfe in Oesterreich | 🇦🇹 AT | 0 | 1 | 4 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.