AS210175 Lietuvos Interneto Paslaugu Teikeju Asociacija 🇱🇹 LT
Announcing 1 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
1
256 (1 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
0
-
Upstreams
2
transit providers observed
Peers
1
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
7
transit customers observed
Customer cone
7
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS210175
- Name
- Lietuvos Interneto Paslaugu Teikeju Asociacija
- Organisation
- Lietuvos Interneto Paslaugu Teikeju Asociacija
- Country
- 🇱🇹 LT
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2018-09-26
- Network type
- Non-Profit
- Traffic levels
- 10-20Gbps
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS-LIPTA
- Website
- https://lipta.lt
- PeeringDB
- net/22806
- Facilities
- 2
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 65,614 | 3,992 | 68 | CAIDA |
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 53,090 | 185 | 575 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS1257 Tele2 Sverige AB | 🇪🇺 EU | 404 | 381 | 2 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS39067 ETANETAS UAB | 🇱🇹 LT | 2 | 3 | 2 | inferred |
| AS202085 UAB Kvartalo Tinklas | 🇱🇹 LT | 0 | 6 | 138 | CAIDA |
| AS197225 UAB "Airnet TV" | 🇱🇹 LT | 0 | 4 | 105 | CAIDA |
| AS202725 UAB "Zetanetas" | 🇱🇹 LT | 0 | 2 | 92 | CAIDA |
| AS49602 Private Limited Liability Company "KRENA" | 🇱🇹 LT | 0 | 2 | 92 | CAIDA |
| AS201096 UAB Eltida | 🇱🇹 LT | 0 | 2 | 92 | CAIDA |
| AS56847 V.Ivanciko individuali imone "Zaibas" | 🇱🇹 LT | 0 | 2 | 76 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.