AS210619 Monkey Tree Hosting Limited 🇬🇧 GB

Announcing 17 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
11
22,272 (87 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
6
4 × /32
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
12
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
1
transit customers observed
Customer cone
2
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS210619
Name
Monkey Tree Hosting Limited
Organisation
MTH Networks
Country
🇬🇧 GB
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2023-01-24
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Traffic levels
200-300Gbps
Scope
Europe
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS210619:AS-MTH-NETWORKS
PeeringDB
net/32089
Exchanges
2
Facilities
2

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

13 valid (76.5%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 4 no ROA (23.5%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC 🇺🇸 US 65,660 4,037 199 CAIDA
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 53,567 235 483 CAIDA
AS9002 RETN Limited 🇬🇧 GB 50,568 19 19 inferred
AS213241 TECHIT.BE SRL 🇧🇪 BE 0 14 7 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS33891 Core-Backbone GmbH 🇩🇪 DE 24,619 1 5 CAIDA
AS3216 Vimpelcom PJSC 🇷🇺 RU 23,759 590 1 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions 🇧🇫 BF 21,513 64 14 CAIDA
AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG 🇩🇪 DE 15,442 48 49 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 4,747 45 21 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. 🇵🇭 PH 268 567 21 CAIDA
AS25091 IP-Max SA 🇨🇭 CH 170 25 7 CAIDA
AS12779 IT.Gate S.p.A. 🇮🇹 IT 75 25 1 CAIDA
AS50304 Blix Solutions AS 🇳🇴 NO 34 97 15 CAIDA
AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch 🇦🇹 AT 15 8 17 CAIDA
AS48185 team.blue NV 🇧🇪 BE 14 1 17 CAIDA
AS50300 CustodianDC Limited 🇬🇧 GB 9 39 21 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS213603 Hull Fibre Ltd 🇬🇧 GB 0 3 174 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.