AS211501 High Tide Group Limited πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB

Announcing 4 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
2
512 (2 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
2
8 Γ— /32
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
11
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
1
transit customers observed
Customer cone
2
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS211501
Name
High Tide Group Limited
Organisation
High Tide Group
Country
πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2021-04-12
Network type
NSP
Traffic levels
1-5Gbps
Scope
Europe
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-HIGHTIDEGROUP
PeeringDB
net/26570
Exchanges
3
Facilities
7

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

4 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS3170 VeloxServ Communications Ltd πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 106 71 15 CAIDA
AS41495 Faelix Limited πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 10 5 78 CAIDA
AS213241 TECHIT.BE SRL πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺ BE 0 14 3 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 54,151 185 97 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions πŸ‡§πŸ‡« BF 23,868 64 3 CAIDA
AS31500 Global Network Management Inc πŸ‡¦πŸ‡¬ AG 21,487 40 2 CAIDA
AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ DE 15,645 48 14 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 4,857 45 6 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. πŸ‡΅πŸ‡­ PH 274 567 4 CAIDA
AS25091 IP-Max SA πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ CH 206 25 3 CAIDA
AS50304 Blix Solutions AS πŸ‡³πŸ‡΄ NO 34 103 6 CAIDA
AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ή AT 16 8 4 CAIDA
AS48185 team.blue NV πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺ BE 14 1 5 CAIDA
AS50300 CustodianDC Limited πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 9 39 6 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS215008 e-volve Solutions Ltd πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 0 1 82 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.