AS213279 Reliably Coded B.V. 🇳🇱 NL

Announcing 5 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
2
512 (2 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
3
3 × /32
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
13
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS213279
Name
Reliably Coded B.V.
Organisation
Reliably Coded
Country
🇳🇱 NL
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2020-05-06
Network type
Educational/Research
Traffic levels
0-20Mbps
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-RELIABLYCODED
PeeringDB
net/23172
Exchanges
2

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

4 valid (80.0%) 1 invalid (20.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS34927 iFog GmbH 🇨🇭 CH 20,120 39 60 CAIDA
AS212508 Lowhosting services of Davide Gennari 🇮🇹 IT 187 6 2 CAIDA
AS29632 Netassist International EOOD 🇧🇬 BG 45 0 2 inferred
AS212027 PebbleHost Ltd 🇬🇧 GB 12 24 48 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 56,885 236 31 CAIDA
AS4657 StarHub Ltd 🇸🇬 SG 37,118 208 1 CAIDA
AS20485 TransTeleCom JSC 🇷🇺 RU 28,482 85 2 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions 🇧🇫 BF 26,208 64 2 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 20,789 45 3 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. 🇵🇭 PH 244 567 2 CAIDA
AS6696 VERIXI SA 🇧🇪 BE 172 49 2 CAIDA
AS48185 team.blue NV 🇧🇪 BE 14 1 3 CAIDA
AS204092 Association GRIFON 🇫🇷 FR 10 2 3 CAIDA
AS3333 Reseaux IP Europeens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC) 🇳🇱 NL 0 7 3 CAIDA
AS57821 Nonattached Network e.V. 🇩🇪 DE 0 1 3 CAIDA
AS202365 Chronos 🇹🇷 TR 0 4 2 CAIDA
AS34800 Securebit AG 🇨🇭 CH 0 1 2 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.