AS21500 Scientific Production Enterprise "Technaukservice" Ltd πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ UA

Announcing 22 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
21
9,984 (39 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
8 Γ— /32
Upstreams
2
transit providers observed
Peers
2
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
9
transit customers observed
Customer cone
10
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS21500
Name
Scientific Production Enterprise "Technaukservice" Ltd
Organisation
Scientific Production Enterprise "Technaukservice" Ltd
Country
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ UA
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2002-01-04
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Traffic levels
5-10Gbps
Scope
Europe
Peering policy
Selective
IRR as-set
AS-TNSUA
PeeringDB
net/13739
Exchanges
1
Facilities
1

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

17 valid (77.3%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 5 no ROA (22.7%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS3326 Datagroup PJSC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ UA 528 85 795 CAIDA
AS62206 Pitline Ltd πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ UA 41 12 1,221 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 56,548 236 5 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 20,534 45 40 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS21437 Aviti ltd. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ UA 0 10 480 CAIDA
AS30790 Ellipse ltd. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ UA 0 3 144 CAIDA
AS15800 COORDINATOR LTD πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ UA 0 3 129 CAIDA
AS60455 "ABC" UCRANIAN-FRANCH JOINT VENTURE πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ UA 0 3 75 CAIDA
AS199263 New Systems AM LTD πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ UA 0 1 48 CAIDA
AS31598 TOV "OPTIK.NET" πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ UA 0 1 48 CAIDA
AS56851 PE Skurykhin Mukola Volodumurovuch πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ UA 0 35 48 CAIDA
AS24618 Scientific Production Enterprise "Technaukservice" Ltd πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ UA 0 1 47 CAIDA
AS20709 Techinform Ltd πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ UA 0 2 2 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.