AS216309 InvisionTech Group S.r.l. 🇮🇹 IT
Announcing 5 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
1
256 (1 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
4
514 × /48
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
2
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
5
transit customers observed
Customer cone
15
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS216309
- Name
- InvisionTech Group S.r.l.
- Organisation
- InvisionTech Group S.r.l.
- Country
- 🇮🇹 IT
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2025-03-24
- Network type
- NSP
- Traffic levels
- 100-200Gbps
- Scope
- Europe
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS216309:AS-INVISIONTECH
- Website
- https://invisiontech.eu
- Looking glass
- https://lg.invisiontech.eu
- PeeringDB
- net/39107
- Exchanges
- 1
- Facilities
- 1
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS41720 Revolution Provider S.r.l. | 🇮🇹 IT | 22 | 13 | 76 | CAIDA |
| AS198064 ZEROPACKETS LTD | 🇬🇧 GB | 16 | 0 | 12 | CAIDA |
| AS213791 XeniaGroup SRL | 🇮🇹 IT | 0 | 4 | 6 | inferred |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 54,099 | 185 | 367 | CAIDA |
| AS59919 Brainbox S.r.l. | 🇮🇹 IT | 2 | 8 | 12 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS212271 Cinzia Tocci trading as Lumanex Srl | 🇮🇹 IT | 11 | 3 | 143 | CAIDA |
| AS6517 LAKENETWORKS | 🇺🇸 US | 7 | 5 | 13 | inferred |
| AS201815 ItalPetrolCemenTermoTessilFarmoMetalChimica LTD | 🇬🇧 GB | 0 | 1 | 79 | CAIDA |
| AS202704 Digitalia ICT srl | 🇮🇹 IT | 0 | 3 | 37 | CAIDA |
| AS21429 Sicob S.r.l. | 🇮🇹 IT | 0 | 1 | 8 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.