AS23089 Hotwire Communications πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US

Announcing 622 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
608
714,752 (2,792 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
14
10,502 Γ— /48
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
4
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
7
transit customers observed
Customer cone
7
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS23089
Name
Hotwire Communications
Organisation
Hotwire Communications
Country
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US
RIR
ARIN
Allocated
2007-10-04
Network type
NSP
Traffic levels
500-1000Gbps
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Selective
IRR as-set
AS-HOTWIRE
PeeringDB
net/4454
Exchanges
6
Facilities
12

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

7 valid (1.1%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 615 no ROA (98.9%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 70,633 2,075 3,827 CAIDA
AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 65,465 4,019 8,289 CAIDA
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 52,731 235 14,425 CAIDA
AS6461 Zayo Bandwidth πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 49,528 213 1,187 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS3303 Swisscom (Schweiz) AG πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ CH 20,310 345 1 CAIDA
AS9304 HGC Global Communications Limited πŸ‡­πŸ‡° HK 6,051 1,973 285 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 4,712 45 355 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. πŸ‡΅πŸ‡­ PH 270 567 9 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS62622 Hotwire Communications πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 8 376 CAIDA
AS17082 SMART CITY NETWORKS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 6 256 CAIDA
AS396260 Fontainebleau Miami Beach πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 2 94 CAIDA
AS62954 Walser Technology Group Inc. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 2 82 CAIDA
AS402211 UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 1 45 inferred
AS18698 Icahn Associates Corp. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 1 31 CAIDA
AS26903 City of Salisbury, North Carolina πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 2 5 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.