AS23158 ETEX COMMUNICATIONS, LLC 🇺🇸 US
Announcing 29 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
29
33,792 (132 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
0
-
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
9
transit customers observed
Customer cone
12
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS23158
- Name
- ETEX COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
- Organisation
- ETEX COMMUNICATIONS
- Country
- 🇺🇸 US
- RIR
- ARIN
- Allocated
- 2007-10-05
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 100-200Gbps
- Scope
- North America
- Peering policy
- Restrictive
- IRR as-set
- AS23158:AS-PDB-ETEXCOMM
- Website
- http://www.etex.net
- PeeringDB
- net/35175
- Facilities
- 1
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 65,634 | 3,987 | 641 | CAIDA |
| AS46849 TEXAS LONE STAR NETWORK, LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 32 | 5 | 1,214 | CAIDA |
| AS40317 Peoples Communications Inc. | 🇺🇸 US | 19 | 68 | 129 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
No peers observed at the collectors.
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS395571 Tyler Vault | 🇺🇸 US | 3 | 8 | 276 | CAIDA |
| AS399962 Cherokee County Electric Cooperative Association | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 2 | 92 | CAIDA |
| AS397886 SUPERNet | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 5 | 49 | CAIDA |
| AS22247 LeTourneau University | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 1 | 46 | CAIDA |
| AS398881 SFG, LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 1 | 46 | CAIDA |
| AS400344 East Texas Broadband | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 1 | 46 | CAIDA |
| AS400845 ECXSYSTEMS, LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 1 | 46 | CAIDA |
| AS398162 Panola College | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 1 | 45 | CAIDA |
| AS18981 SUPERNet II | 🇺🇸 US | 0 | 1 | 28 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.