AS23428 ServerForge LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US

Announcing 14 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
5
1,280 (5 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
9
324 Γ— /48
Upstreams
7
transit providers observed
Peers
6
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
2
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS23428
Name
ServerForge LLC
Organisation
ServerForge LLC NA
Country
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US
RIR
ARIN
Allocated
2022-07-07
Network type
Educational/Research
Traffic levels
10-20Gbps
Scope
North America
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-SERVERFORGE
PeeringDB
net/30407
Exchanges
11
Facilities
5

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

14 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS1299 Arelion (fka. Telia Carrier) πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺ SE 69,907 130 19 CAIDA
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 56,577 236 228 CAIDA
AS52025 ParadoxNetworks Limited πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 19,841 15 148 CAIDA
AS64289 Macarne.com πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 1,162 7 17 CAIDA
AS61138 Zappie Host LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 50 19 36 CAIDA
AS22611 InMotion Hosting, Inc. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 4 81 74 CAIDA
AS54641 InMotion Hosting, Inc. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 3 53 75 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS9002 RETN Limited πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ GB 53,242 19 5 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 20,598 45 4 CAIDA
AS7575 Australian Academic and Research Network (AARNet) πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί AU 20,172 202 1 CAIDA
AS34927 iFog GmbH πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ CH 19,928 38 4 CAIDA
AS394256 Tech Futures Interactive Inc. πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ CA 387 22 4 CAIDA
AS58057 Securebit AG πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ CH 19 14 2 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS207556 ServerForge LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 0 37 inferred
AS50842 ServerForge LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 0 0 37 inferred

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.