AS24088 Hanoi Telecom Joint Stock Company - HCMC Branch 🇻🇳 VN
Announcing 109 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
105
46,080 (180 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
4
4 × /48
Upstreams
9
transit providers observed
Peers
3
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
24
transit customers observed
Customer cone
41
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS24088
- Name
- Hanoi Telecom Joint Stock Company - HCMC Branch
- Organisation
- HITC
- Country
- 🇻🇳 VN
- RIR
- APNIC
- Allocated
- 2004-06-22
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 100-200Gbps
- Scope
- Asia Pacific
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS-HANOITELECOM
- Website
- https://hitc.vn/
- PeeringDB
- net/7297
- Exchanges
- 4
- Facilities
- 2
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS1299 Arelion (fka. Telia Carrier) | 🇸🇪 SE | 68,549 | 134 | 857 | CAIDA |
| AS2914 NTT America, Inc. | 🇺🇸 US | 56,422 | 1,541 | 79 | CAIDA |
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 54,012 | 185 | 11,691 | CAIDA |
| AS3491 PCCW Global (HK) Ltd. | 🇭🇰 HK | 50,954 | 532 | 75 | CAIDA |
| AS58453 China Mobile International | 🇭🇰 HK | 25,109 | 76 | 1 | CAIDA |
| AS7552 Viettel Group | 🇻🇳 VN | 23,234 | 4,080 | 386 | CAIDA |
| AS9304 HGC Global Communications Limited | 🇭🇰 HK | 6,272 | 2,162 | 715 | CAIDA |
| AS135273 NTC ASIA LIMITED | 🇭🇰 HK | 47 | 25 | 408 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS9002 RETN Limited | 🇬🇧 GB | 51,778 | 18 | 2 | CAIDA |
| AS8966 Etisalat (E&) | 🇦🇪 AE | 46,623 | 49 | 1 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,708 | 45 | 69 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.