AS24138 China TieTong Telecommunications Corporation 🇨🇳 CN
Announcing 261 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
261
1,802,752 (7,042 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
0
-
Upstreams
2
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
8
transit customers observed
Customer cone
9
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS24138
- Name
- China TieTong Telecommunications Corporation
- Organisation
- China Tietong
- Country
- 🇨🇳 CN
- RIR
- APNIC
- Allocated
- 2004-08-23
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Open
- PeeringDB
- net/9394
- Exchanges
- 1
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS56048 China Mobile Group Beijing Company | 🇨🇳 CN | 52 | 766 | 4 | CAIDA |
| AS9394 China TieTong Telecommunications Corporation | 🇨🇳 CN | 11 | 127 | 9,467 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
No peers observed at the collectors.
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS17964 Beijing Dian-Xin-Tong Network Technologies Co., Ltd. | 🇨🇳 CN | 0 | 121 | 110 | CAIDA |
| AS45058 Golden-Bridge Netcom communication Co.,LTD. | 🇨🇳 CN | 0 | 28 | 49 | CAIDA |
| AS23844 Beijing Guanghuan Xinwang Digital | 🇨🇳 CN | 0 | 64 | 38 | CAIDA |
| AS56019 Beijing ShuJuJia Technology Co., Ltd. | 🇨🇳 CN | 0 | 23 | 33 | CAIDA |
| AS56282 Beijing Internet Harbor Technology Co., Ltd | 🇨🇳 CN | 0 | 50 | 26 | CAIDA |
| AS18118 CITIC Networks Management Co.,Ltd. | 🇨🇳 CN | 0 | 37 | 12 | CAIDA |
| AS59089 NO.18 Building University of Technology | 🇨🇳 CN | 0 | 1 | 2 | CAIDA |
| AS131495 Beijing nine cloud infinite network technology co., LTD | 🇨🇳 CN | 0 | 2 | 2 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.