AS25279 Treml+Sturm Datentechnik GmbH 🇩🇪 DE

Announcing 2 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
1
4,096 (16 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
8 × /32
Upstreams
7
transit providers observed
Peers
10
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
0
transit customers observed
Customer cone
0
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS25279
Name
Treml+Sturm Datentechnik GmbH
Organisation
Treml & Sturm Datentechnik GmbH
Country
🇩🇪 DE
RIR
RIPENCC
Allocated
2002-09-23
Network type
Content
Traffic levels
10-20Gbps
Scope
Europe
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-TREML-STURM
PeeringDB
net/2699
Exchanges
3
Facilities
8

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

2 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS2914 NTT America, Inc. 🇺🇸 US 56,508 1,525 8 CAIDA
AS3320 Deutsche Telekom AG 🇩🇪 DE 51,693 910 2 CAIDA
AS33891 Core-Backbone GmbH 🇩🇪 DE 27,007 1 20 CAIDA
AS50263 A-Systems Sp. z o.o. 🇵🇱 PL 1,489 1 2 CAIDA
AS13101 TNG Stadtnetz GmbH 🇩🇪 DE 63 33 12 CAIDA
AS29632 Netassist International EOOD 🇧🇬 BG 46 0 2 inferred
AS213241 TECHIT.BE SRL 🇧🇪 BE 0 14 1 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC 🇺🇸 US 54,099 185 13 CAIDA
AS20485 TransTeleCom JSC 🇷🇺 RU 30,437 85 1 CAIDA
AS34549 meerfarbig GmbH & Co. KG 🇩🇪 DE 15,644 48 6 CAIDA
AS34927 iFog GmbH 🇨🇭 CH 15,531 38 1 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS 🇸🇬 SG 4,858 45 2 CAIDA
AS17639 Converge ICT Solutions Inc. 🇵🇭 PH 274 567 1 CAIDA
AS12779 IT.Gate S.p.A. 🇮🇹 IT 76 25 1 CAIDA
AS34019 Hivane Association 🇫🇷 FR 38 6 2 CAIDA
AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch 🇦🇹 AT 16 8 2 CAIDA
AS212024 Marc Schmitt 🇫🇷 FR 0 1 2 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

No downstreams observed at the collectors.

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.