AS25761 55 IT Services GmbH π¦πΉ AT
Announcing 2 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
1
256 (1 Γ /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 Γ /48
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
4
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
4
transit customers observed
Customer cone
6
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS25761
- Name
- 55 IT Services GmbH
- Organisation
- 55 IT Services GmbH
- Country
- π¦πΉ AT
- RIR
- RIPENCC
- Allocated
- 2022-05-02
- Network type
- NSP
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS25761:AS-FIFTYFIVE
- Website
- https://www.55it.at
- PeeringDB
- net/1334
- Exchanges
- 2
- Facilities
- 6
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS1299 Arelion (fka. Telia Carrier) | πΈπͺ SE | 68,339 | 134 | 268 | CAIDA |
| AS9002 RETN Limited | π¬π§ GB | 50,217 | 18 | 5 | inferred |
| AS5405 Inter.link GmbH | π©πͺ DE | 29,184 | 11 | 100 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | πΊπΈ US | 53,149 | 185 | 69 | CAIDA |
| AS3303 Swisscom (Schweiz) AG | π¨π CH | 20,491 | 345 | 4 | CAIDA |
| AS15935 ha-vel internet s.r.o. | π¨πΏ CZ | 33 | 13 | 9 | CAIDA |
| AS48362 Stadtwerke Feldkirch | π¦πΉ AT | 16 | 8 | 9 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS51658 lucesem technology GmbH | π¦πΉ AT | 2 | 1 | 68 | CAIDA |
| AS60274 EDV Consulting Zoichter GmbH | π¦πΉ AT | 0 | 3 | 127 | CAIDA |
| AS210626 Lipicer KG | π¦πΉ AT | 0 | 2 | 117 | CAIDA |
| AS219391 Ub services FlexCo (Flexible Kapitalgesellschaft) | π¦πΉ AT | 0 | 1 | 76 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.