AS262417 UltraTelecom Provedora de Internet πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR

Announcing 54 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
51
49,920 (195 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
3
2 Γ— /32
Upstreams
2
transit providers observed
Peers
5
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
7
transit customers observed
Customer cone
14
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS262417
Name
UltraTelecom Provedora de Internet
Organisation
UltraTelecom
Country
πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR
RIR
LACNIC
Allocated
2011-03-15
Network type
NSP
Traffic levels
100-200Gbps
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Selective
IRR as-set
AS-ULTRATELECOM-BR
PeeringDB
net/9289
Exchanges
5
Facilities
3

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

54 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS263444 Open X Tecnologia Ltda πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 21,967 11 1,156 CAIDA
AS28283 Adyl Telecom πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 885 8 401 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 55,147 236 326 CAIDA
AS35280 F5 Networks SARL πŸ‡«πŸ‡· FR 30,065 59 40 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions πŸ‡§πŸ‡« BF 26,285 64 40 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 21,009 45 72 CAIDA
AS25091 IP-Max SA πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­ CH 195 25 2 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS264009 INFIX TELECOM LTDA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 5 15 233 CAIDA
AS263105 Plugnet Informatica Ltda πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 2 5 86 CAIDA
AS265914 TRIUNFO FIBRA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 2 3 36 CAIDA
AS262661 Linknet TelecomunicaΓ§oes πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 12 396 CAIDA
AS264536 DIRETRIX COMΓ‰RCIO INFORMATICA LTDA. πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 14 150 CAIDA
AS270828 FULL NET πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 5 43 CAIDA
AS271172 Megalink Servico de Comunicacao Multimidia Scm Lt πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 1 43 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.