AS262720 GIGABYTE TELECOM 🇧🇷 BR
MELO TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA. Announcing 41 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
40
32,000 (125 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 × /32
Upstreams
7
transit providers observed
Peers
2
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
4
transit customers observed
Customer cone
6
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS262720
- Name
- GIGABYTE TELECOM
- Organisation
- Melo Telecomunicações
- Country
- 🇧🇷 BR
- RIR
- LACNIC
- Allocated
- 2010-05-03
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 100-200Gbps
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Selective
- IRR as-set
- AS-262720
- PeeringDB
- net/8011
- Exchanges
- 1
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) | 🇺🇸 US | 72,760 | 2,074 | 1,370 | CAIDA |
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | 🇧🇫 BF | 38,783 | 64 | 1 | inferred |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 38,426 | 45 | 2 | inferred |
| AS37468 Angola Cables | 🇦🇴 AO | 38,301 | 15 | 153 | CAIDA |
| AS16735 Algar Telecom | 🇧🇷 BR | 38,301 | 46 | 5 | CAIDA |
| AS27693 NipBr - NipCable do Brasil Telecom LTDA | 🇧🇷 BR | 53 | 18 | 53 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 56,818 | 241 | 440 | CAIDA |
| AS35280 F5 Networks SARL | 🇫🇷 FR | 40,477 | 60 | 34 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS271165 SKYNETLINK COMERCE & SERVICE EIRELI | 🇧🇷 BR | 2 | 4 | 35 | CAIDA |
| AS263466 FRENTE TELECOM | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 86 | 1,063 | CAIDA |
| AS263090 NETWORK TELECOM | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 10 | 364 | CAIDA |
| AS53198 Itaol Networks Systems | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 1 | 75 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.