AS262761 Sinal Br Telecom Ltda π§π· BR
Announcing 106 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
49
12,544 (49 Γ /24)
IPv6 prefixes
57
1 Γ /32
Upstreams
5
transit providers observed
Peers
6
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
55
transit customers observed
Customer cone
19,689
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS262761
- Name
- Sinal Br Telecom Ltda
- Organisation
- Sinal BR Telecom
- Country
- π§π· BR
- RIR
- LACNIC
- Allocated
- 2010-07-30
- Network type
- NSP
- Traffic levels
- 300-500Gbps
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Selective
- IRR as-set
- AS262761:AS-GLOBAL
- Website
- http://www.sinalbr.com.br
- Looking glass
- http://lg.sinalbr.com.br/
- PeeringDB
- net/5753
- Exchanges
- 6
- Facilities
- 3
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC | πΊπΈ US | 65,273 | 3,891 | 1,252 | CAIDA |
| AS268624 Gamers Club Ltda | π§π· BR | 33,601 | 41 | 124 | inferred |
| AS16735 Algar Telecom | π§π· BR | 23,649 | 46 | 2,093 | CAIDA |
| AS263444 Open X Tecnologia Ltda | π§π· BR | 20,710 | 11 | 9,899 | CAIDA |
| AS1103 SURF B.V. | π³π± NL | 30 | 99 | 168 | inferred |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | πΊπΈ US | 55,252 | 240 | 1,331 | CAIDA |
| AS35280 F5 Networks SARL | π«π· FR | 29,419 | 60 | 10 | CAIDA |
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | π§π« BF | 25,754 | 64 | 221 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | πΈπ¬ SG | 20,376 | 45 | 327 | CAIDA |
| AS28258 VERO S.A | π§π· BR | 19,687 | 122 | 16 | CAIDA |
| AS25091 IP-Max SA | π¨π CH | 193 | 25 | 5 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.