AS262765 Velloznet Solucoes em Conectividade 🇧🇷 BR
Net Fácil Sistemas Eletrônicos Ltda ME. Announcing 82 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
59
32,768 (128 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
23
4 × /32
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
3
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
3
transit customers observed
Customer cone
4
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS262765
- Name
- Velloznet Solucoes em Conectividade
- Organisation
- NET FACIL SISTEMAS ELETRONICOS
- Country
- 🇧🇷 BR
- RIR
- LACNIC
- Allocated
- 2010-08-17
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 100-200Gbps
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS262765:AS-VELLOZNET-ALL
- Website
- http://velloznet.com.br
- Looking glass
- http://lg.velloznet.com.br/
- PeeringDB
- net/6400
- Exchanges
- 2
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS2914 NTT America, Inc. | 🇺🇸 US | 57,805 | 1,698 | 1,739 | CAIDA |
| AS16735 Algar Telecom | 🇧🇷 BR | 22,441 | 46 | 3,150 | CAIDA |
| AS22381 SAMM (Megatelecom) | 🇧🇷 BR | 21,525 | 102 | 16 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS35280 F5 Networks SARL | 🇫🇷 FR | 28,315 | 59 | 12 | CAIDA |
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | 🇧🇫 BF | 26,180 | 64 | 81 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 20,845 | 45 | 82 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS262797 PROVALE SCM LTDA | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 53 | 2,023 | CAIDA |
| AS263568 Guardian Brasil Vidros Planos Ltda. | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 3 | 129 | CAIDA |
| AS262515 FUNDACAO JOAO PAULO II | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 3 | 51 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.