AS263098 Eyes Nwhere Sistemas Inteligentes de Imagem Ltda 🇧🇷 BR
Announcing 24 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
14
3,584 (14 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
10
2,050 × /48
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
3
transit customers observed
Customer cone
6
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS263098
- Name
- Eyes Nwhere Sistemas Inteligentes de Imagem Ltda
- Organisation
- Eyes Nwhere Sistemas Inteligentes de Imagem
- Country
- 🇧🇷 BR
- RIR
- LACNIC
- Allocated
- 2012-04-26
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 20-50Gbps
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS263098:AS-ENW-NETWORKS
- Website
- https://enw.com.br
- Looking glass
- http://lg.enw.com.br
- PeeringDB
- net/26842
- Exchanges
- 1
- Facilities
- 1
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS4230 Claro (Embratel) | 🇧🇷 BR | 33,004 | 81 | 86 | CAIDA |
| AS7738 V.tal (fka Telemar) | 🇧🇷 BR | 30,591 | 236 | 437 | CAIDA |
| AS265269 MEGA TELE INFORMATICA | 🇧🇷 BR | 275 | 14 | 12 | CAIDA |
| AS266583 Telxe | 🇧🇷 BR | 110 | 8 | 785 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS52890 Centro Integrado de Telemática do Exército | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 25 | 19 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS61580 OpenCDN NIC.br | 🇧🇷 BR | 3 | 5 | 300 | CAIDA |
| AS271047 MPAM - Procuradoria-Geral de Justica do Amazonas | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 1 | 43 | CAIDA |
| AS268293 Tribunal Regional do Trabalho - 11ª Região | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 1 | 2 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.