AS263237 PowerHost Telecom SPA π¨π± CL
Announcing 18 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
15
6,400 (25 Γ /24)
IPv6 prefixes
3
3 Γ /48
Upstreams
6
transit providers observed
Peers
3
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
23
transit customers observed
Customer cone
152
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS263237
- Name
- PowerHost Telecom SPA
- Organisation
- PowerHost Chile
- Country
- π¨π± CL
- RIR
- LACNIC
- Allocated
- 2014-05-22
- Traffic levels
- 5-10Tbps
- Scope
- Global
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS263237:AS-POWERHOST
- Website
- https://www.powerhost.cl
- Looking glass
- http://lg.powerhost.cl/
- PeeringDB
- net/11995
- Exchanges
- 10
- Facilities
- 27
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC | πΊπΈ US | 66,126 | 3,954 | 2,143 | CAIDA |
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | πΊπΈ US | 54,416 | 185 | 8,613 | CAIDA |
| AS7195 EdgeUno | π¨π΄ CO | 37,590 | 129 | 4 | CAIDA |
| AS53427 TGLOBAL NETWORKS | πΊπΈ US | 20,110 | 1 | 2 | CAIDA |
| AS15830 Equinix, Inc. | π³π± NL | 18,496 | 1,079 | 301 | CAIDA |
| AS28329 SAMM (G8/Megatelecom) | π§π· BR | 3,844 | 26 | 474 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS35280 F5 Networks SARL | π«π· FR | 24,308 | 59 | 2 | CAIDA |
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | π§π« BF | 23,867 | 64 | 21 | CAIDA |
| AS52925 Ascenty Data Centers e TelecomunicaΓ§Γ΅es S/A | π§π· BR | 17,658 | 22 | 143 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | πΈπ¬ SG | 4,865 | 45 | 182 | CAIDA |
| AS40850 UPIX NETWORKS INTERNATIONAL LLC | πΊπΈ US | 4,067 | 11 | 38 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.