AS263877 REDE BANDA LARGA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR

rede banda larga. Announcing 17 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
14
6,144 (24 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
3
2 Γ— /32
Upstreams
6
transit providers observed
Peers
1
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
7
transit customers observed
Customer cone
11
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS263877
Name
REDE BANDA LARGA
Organisation
REDE BANDA LARGA
Country
πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR
RIR
LACNIC
Allocated
2015-07-29
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Traffic levels
100-200Gbps
Scope
South America
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS-263877
PeeringDB
net/13373
Exchanges
1
Facilities
2

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

17 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 71,395 2,087 486 CAIDA
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 54,152 185 166 inferred
AS268624 Gamers Club Ltda πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 37,763 33 188 CAIDA
AS52468 UFINET PANAMA S.A. πŸ‡΅πŸ‡¦ PA 30,448 948 31 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions πŸ‡§πŸ‡« BF 23,855 64 4 inferred
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 4,854 45 12 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS35280 F5 Networks SARL πŸ‡«πŸ‡· FR 24,301 59 16 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS265465 JJVA Provedor de Internet ME LTDA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 7 4 68 inferred
AS266471 Sky Tecnet πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 5 5 93 CAIDA
AS266948 IBIUNET MULTIPLAY πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 3 7 107 CAIDA
AS270691 REVNET TELECOMUNICACOES E SERVICOS LTDA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 2 219 inferred
AS268683 rede banda larga πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 3 132 CAIDA
AS268819 Mimo Net Ltda πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 3 78 CAIDA
AS274678 NEXT FIBER INTERNET PARA TODOS LTDA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 0 34 inferred

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.