AS264169 WNP INTERNET 🇧🇷 BR
Announcing 20 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
9
2,560 (10 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
11
29,193 × /48
Upstreams
7
transit providers observed
Peers
1
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
3
transit customers observed
Customer cone
6
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS264169
- Name
- WNP INTERNET
- Organisation
- WNP PROGRESSO E SERV DE TELECOMUNICACAO
- Country
- 🇧🇷 BR
- RIR
- LACNIC
- Allocated
- 2015-03-23
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 5-10Gbps
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS264169
- Website
- https://wnp.net.br/
- PeeringDB
- net/15795
- Exchanges
- 3
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS1031 PEER 1031 LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 33,554 | 0 | 5 | CAIDA |
| AS53062 ACESSOLINE TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA | 🇧🇷 BR | 20,922 | 92 | 53 | CAIDA |
| AS271253 LINK BRASIL TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA | 🇧🇷 BR | 867 | 15 | 20 | CAIDA |
| AS262907 Brasil TecPar | 🇧🇷 BR | 233 | 533 | 572 | CAIDA |
| AS266445 SEA TELECOM LTDA | 🇧🇷 BR | 149 | 12 | 3 | CAIDA |
| AS266337 CLIC FÁCIL PROVEDOR | 🇧🇷 BR | 93 | 6 | 62 | CAIDA |
| AS263650 Clicfacil Telecom | 🇧🇷 BR | 9 | 17 | 87 | inferred |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 20,914 | 45 | 12 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS268664 MEGA TOP MULTIMÍDIA LTDA-ME | 🇧🇷 BR | 2 | 3 | 46 | CAIDA |
| AS263611 ZUM TELECOM LTDA- ME | 🇧🇷 BR | 2 | 19 | 28 | CAIDA |
| AS267393 ACCESS INTERNET | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 5 | 16 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.