AS264496 Fibralink LTDA π§π· BR
Announcing 34 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
29
9,984 (39 Γ /24)
IPv6 prefixes
5
16,385 Γ /48
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
2
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
3
transit customers observed
Customer cone
6
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS264496
- Name
- Fibralink LTDA
- Organisation
- IR Tecnologia LTDA
- Country
- π§π· BR
- RIR
- LACNIC
- Allocated
- 2014-12-04
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 200-300Gbps
- Scope
- South America
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS264496
- Website
- https://www.fibralink.net.br/
- Looking glass
- https://bgp.he.net/AS264496#_asinfo
- PeeringDB
- net/10845
- Exchanges
- 2
- Facilities
- 2
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS52468 UFINET PANAMA S.A. | π΅π¦ PA | 30,649 | 967 | 63 | CAIDA |
| AS267613 ELETRONET S.A. | π§π· BR | 20,666 | 5 | 1,210 | CAIDA |
| AS61832 Giga+ Empresas | π§π· BR | 20,573 | 38 | 82 | CAIDA |
| AS28368 Wirelink (Sobralnet) | π§π· BR | 20,335 | 109 | 1 | inferred |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | πΊπΈ US | 55,294 | 236 | 288 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | πΈπ¬ SG | 20,845 | 45 | 36 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS61776 Proserv / PROVEDOR DE ACESSO A INTERNET LTDA | π§π· BR | 3 | 10 | 17 | CAIDA |
| AS266568 MBG TECNOLOGIA LTDA EPP | π§π· BR | 0 | 4 | 172 | CAIDA |
| AS268057 J C G SILVA INFORMATICA EIRELI | π§π· BR | 0 | 4 | 46 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.