AS265036 BMJnet Telecom πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR

Announcing 6 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
3
2,048 (8 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
3
2 Γ— /32
Upstreams
2
transit providers observed
Peers
3
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
11
transit customers observed
Customer cone
14
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS265036
Name
BMJnet Telecom
Organisation
BMJNET TELECOM
Country
πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR
RIR
LACNIC
Allocated
2016-06-14
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Traffic levels
50-100Gbps
Scope
South America
Peering policy
Selective
IRR as-set
AS-AS265036
PeeringDB
net/14640
Exchanges
1
Facilities
2

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

6 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS13786 Seaborn (Seabras USA, LLC) πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 37,644 8 1,073 CAIDA
AS52468 UFINET PANAMA S.A. πŸ‡΅πŸ‡¦ PA 30,448 948 508 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 54,152 185 61 CAIDA
AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions πŸ‡§πŸ‡« BF 23,855 64 9 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 4,854 45 43 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS272451 UltraIP Telecom πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 3 0 42 CAIDA
AS61659 godnet telecom πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 2 3 10 CAIDA
AS268928 Manoel da Silva Pinto Filho πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 7 440 CAIDA
AS268175 AIRMAR TELECOM πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 7 402 CAIDA
AS264992 Visionet Fibra Ltda πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 5 316 CAIDA
AS271705 Mega Virtua ServiΓ§os de Internet LTDA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 2 78 CAIDA
AS267496 PAK TELECOMUNICACOES E TECNOLOGIA DA INFORMACAO EI πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 7 70 CAIDA
AS270772 UniΓ£o Networks Telecom Ltda Me πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 4 50 CAIDA
AS269339 CONEXAO WEB TELECOM LTDA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 3 20 CAIDA
AS266341 Amorim Telecom πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 7 19 CAIDA
AS267088 Rede Spirit Telecom πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 3 16 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.