AS265144 MCD INFORMATICA E TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA - ME 🇧🇷 BR
Announcing 16 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
9
3,072 (12 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
7
1.5 × /32
Upstreams
8
transit providers observed
Peers
4
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
23
transit customers observed
Customer cone
421
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS265144
- Name
- MCD INFORMATICA E TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA - ME
- Organisation
- MCD INFORMATICA E TELECOMUNICACOES
- Country
- 🇧🇷 BR
- RIR
- LACNIC
- Allocated
- 2015-11-12
- Network type
- NSP
- Traffic levels
- 50-100Gbps
- Scope
- South America
- Peering policy
- Selective
- IRR as-set
- AS265144:AS-MCD
- Website
- http://www.mcdtelecom.com.br
- PeeringDB
- net/13002
- Exchanges
- 3
- Facilities
- 4
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS2914 NTT America, Inc. | 🇺🇸 US | 55,638 | 1,476 | 609 | CAIDA |
| AS1031 PEER 1031 LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 29,849 | 0 | 519 | CAIDA |
| AS4230 Claro (Embratel) | 🇧🇷 BR | 29,619 | 81 | 60 | CAIDA |
| AS52468 UFINET PANAMA S.A. | 🇵🇦 PA | 23,656 | 948 | 579 | CAIDA |
| AS28329 SAMM (G8/Megatelecom) | 🇧🇷 BR | 749 | 26 | 952 | CAIDA |
| AS263478 DUFIBRANET TELECOM LTDA | 🇧🇷 BR | 16 | 28 | 2 | inferred |
| AS268862 China Mobile International - Brazil | 🇧🇷 BR | 7 | 5 | 2 | inferred |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS33891 Core-Backbone GmbH | 🇩🇪 DE | 27,081 | 1 | 58 | CAIDA |
| AS3303 Swisscom (Schweiz) AG | 🇨🇭 CH | 20,613 | 345 | 4 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,870 | 45 | 48 | CAIDA |
| AS268186 InterOuro Telecom | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 7 | 49 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.