AS265171 SITELBRA LTDA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR

Announcing 63 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
46
58,880 (230 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
17
1.1 Γ— /32
Upstreams
8
transit providers observed
Peers
2
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
6
transit customers observed
Customer cone
5
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS265171
Name
SITELBRA LTDA
Organisation
SITELBRA
Country
πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR
RIR
LACNIC
Allocated
2015-12-01
Network type
NSP
Traffic levels
200-300Gbps
Scope
South America
Peering policy
Selective
IRR as-set
AS265171:AS-SITELBRA
PeeringDB
net/28820
Exchanges
16
Facilities
6

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

0 valid (0.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 63 no ROA (100.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 71,297 2,086 1,451 CAIDA
AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 65,976 3,977 30 CAIDA
AS4230 Claro (Embratel) πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 35,852 81 75 CAIDA
AS16735 Algar Telecom πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 21,773 46 652 CAIDA
AS26615 TIM S/A πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 21,345 1,044 276 CAIDA
AS8167 V.tal πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 20,658 823 542 CAIDA
AS202 Level 3 Parent, LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 222 1 4 CAIDA
AS267501 Equatorial TelecomunicaΓ§Γ΅es LTDA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 96 7 164 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ US 54,017 185 32 CAIDA
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 4,768 45 19 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS274716 GETICOM SOLUCOES EM TECNOLOGIA LTDA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 0 238 inferred
AS266189 SITELBRA LTDA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 5 216 CAIDA
AS271114 GLOBAL LINK TECNOLOGIA EIRELI πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 4 168 CAIDA
AS270789 SITELBRA LTDA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 1 76 CAIDA
AS53012 Secretaria Municipal de Planejamento πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 1 15 CAIDA
AS266122 Banco da Amazonia S/A πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 1 1 inferred

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.