AS265264 ALHAMBRA EIDOS DO BRASIL SERVICOS E SISTEMAS DE CO 🇧🇷 BR
Announcing 15 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
14
6,144 (24 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 × /32
Upstreams
4
transit providers observed
Peers
1
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
4
transit customers observed
Customer cone
4
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS265264
- Name
- ALHAMBRA EIDOS DO BRASIL SERVICOS E SISTEMAS DE CO
- Organisation
- AlhambraIT Brasil
- Country
- 🇧🇷 BR
- RIR
- LACNIC
- Allocated
- 2016-01-13
- Network type
- NSP
- Traffic levels
- 5-10Gbps
- Scope
- Global
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS265264:AS-CUSTOMERS
- Website
- http://www.alhambrait.com.br
- PeeringDB
- net/31860
- Exchanges
- 1
- Facilities
- 7
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) | 🇺🇸 US | 70,970 | 2,083 | 12 | CAIDA |
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 53,055 | 235 | 43 | inferred |
| AS53062 ACESSOLINE TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA | 🇧🇷 BR | 20,794 | 92 | 367 | CAIDA |
| AS28283 Adyl Telecom | 🇧🇷 BR | 981 | 7 | 888 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 5,028 | 45 | 22 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS52976 Datacast Teleinformatica Ltda | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 13 | 583 | CAIDA |
| AS263088 Link Monitoramento | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 1 | 44 | CAIDA |
| AS272638 UNICORN TECNOLOGIA E PARTICIPACOES EIRELI | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 0 | 35 | inferred |
| AS266455 SOFTMARKETING COMUNICACAO E INFORMACAO LTDA | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 1 | 31 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.