AS265975 INTEREDE TELECOM 🇧🇷 BR
Announcing 7 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
4
2,304 (9 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
3
1 × /32
Upstreams
2
transit providers observed
Peers
3
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
6
transit customers observed
Customer cone
6
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS265975
- Name
- INTEREDE TELECOM
- Organisation
- INTEREDE TELECOM
- Country
- 🇧🇷 BR
- RIR
- LACNIC
- Allocated
- 2017-07-18
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Scope
- Not Disclosed
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS265975:AS-INTEREDE
- Website
- https://interede.com.br
- PeeringDB
- net/15217
- Exchanges
- 2
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) | 🇺🇸 US | 72,017 | 2,071 | 525 | CAIDA |
| AS264409 Huge Networks | 🇧🇷 BR | 23,803 | 7 | 169 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 55,546 | 236 | 204 | CAIDA |
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | 🇧🇫 BF | 26,142 | 64 | 4 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 20,853 | 45 | 23 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS266538 ENTERNET PROVEDOR LTDA - ME | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 7 | 227 | CAIDA |
| AS264331 INTEREDE TELECOM | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 4 | 209 | CAIDA |
| AS265014 GNA TELECOM LTDA - ME | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 5 | 80 | CAIDA |
| AS267618 I9-NETCEL TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 3 | 73 | inferred |
| AS273704 RRNET TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 1 | 48 | CAIDA |
| AS273506 CNX Projetos e Tecnologia LTDA | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 1 | 13 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.