AS266003 Brasileiro Telecom π§π· BR
VBS TECNOLOGIA LTDA. Announcing 37 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
14
6,144 (24 Γ /24)
IPv6 prefixes
23
4 Γ /32
Upstreams
2
transit providers observed
Peers
4
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
3
transit customers observed
Customer cone
3
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS266003
- Name
- Brasileiro Telecom
- Organisation
- BRASILEIRO TELECOM
- Country
- π§π· BR
- RIR
- LACNIC
- Allocated
- 2017-07-25
- Network type
- NSP
- Traffic levels
- 10-20Gbps
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS266003:AS-BRASILEIRO-TELECOM-ALL
- Website
- http://brasileirotelecom.com.br/
- PeeringDB
- net/26120
- Exchanges
- 4
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS14840 BR.DIGITAL | π§π· BR | 4,082 | 82 | 188 | CAIDA |
| AS61618 VIVA TECNOLOGIA TELECOM LTDA | π§π· BR | 23 | 6 | 43 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | πΊπΈ US | 55,699 | 236 | 647 | CAIDA |
| AS35280 F5 Networks SARL | π«π· FR | 29,941 | 59 | 4 | CAIDA |
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | π§π« BF | 26,081 | 64 | 10 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | πΈπ¬ SG | 20,812 | 45 | 13 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS270569 JJ NET SERVICOS DE COMUNICACAO MULT LTDA | π§π· BR | 0 | 3 | 138 | CAIDA |
| AS262626 CICLONET SERVICOS DE INTERNET E MULTIMIDIA EIRELI | π§π· BR | 0 | 1 | 41 | CAIDA |
| AS274390 Digital Solution Comunicacao LTDA | π§π· BR | 0 | 0 | 33 | inferred |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.