AS266389 M2B - SOLUCOES EM TECNOLOGIA EIRELLI ME 🇧🇷 BR
Announcing 21 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
15
6,144 (24 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
6
2.1 × /32
Upstreams
5
transit providers observed
Peers
3
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
3
transit customers observed
Customer cone
4
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS266389
- Name
- M2B - SOLUCOES EM TECNOLOGIA EIRELLI ME
- Organisation
- M2B - SOLUCOES EM TECNOLOGIA
- Country
- 🇧🇷 BR
- RIR
- LACNIC
- Allocated
- 2016-11-30
- Traffic levels
- 10-20Gbps
- Scope
- Not Disclosed
- Peering policy
- Selective
- IRR as-set
- AS266389
- Website
- http://www.redem2b.com.br
- Looking glass
- http://lg.redem2b.com.br
- PeeringDB
- net/19875
- Exchanges
- 1
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS1031 PEER 1031 LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 34,693 | 0 | 33 | CAIDA |
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | 🇧🇫 BF | 26,578 | 64 | 4 | inferred |
| AS264409 Huge Networks | 🇧🇷 BR | 23,572 | 7 | 42 | CAIDA |
| AS14840 BR.DIGITAL | 🇧🇷 BR | 3,796 | 82 | 584 | CAIDA |
| AS271253 LINK BRASIL TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA | 🇧🇷 BR | 904 | 15 | 317 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 56,548 | 236 | 102 | CAIDA |
| AS35280 F5 Networks SARL | 🇫🇷 FR | 32,528 | 59 | 4 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 20,534 | 45 | 21 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS269099 AJOTEL TECNOLOGIA EIRELI | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 3 | 234 | CAIDA |
| AS268715 N3 SOLUCOES TECNOLOGICAS LTDA | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 7 | 69 | CAIDA |
| AS268574 REDE 2CR TELECOM | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 1 | 6 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.