AS266539 LINQ TELECOMUNICAÇOES LTDA ME 🇧🇷 BR
LINQ TELECOMUNICACOES. Announcing 5 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
4
17,408 (68 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
1
1 × /32
Upstreams
5
transit providers observed
Peers
1
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
3
transit customers observed
Customer cone
4
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS266539
- Name
- LINQ TELECOMUNICAÇOES LTDA ME
- Organisation
- LINQ TELECOMUNICAÇOES
- Country
- 🇧🇷 BR
- RIR
- LACNIC
- Allocated
- 2017-05-11
- Network type
- Network Services
- Scope
- South America
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS-LINQTELECOM
- Website
- http://www.linq.net.br
- Looking glass
- http://lg.linqtelecom.com.br
- PeeringDB
- net/18986
- Exchanges
- 4
- Facilities
- 3
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) | 🇺🇸 US | 70,706 | 2,079 | 121 | CAIDA |
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 53,605 | 236 | 16 | inferred |
| AS16735 Algar Telecom | 🇧🇷 BR | 23,399 | 46 | 28 | CAIDA |
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | 🇧🇫 BF | 21,550 | 64 | 4 | inferred |
| AS53062 ACESSOLINE TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA | 🇧🇷 BR | 20,463 | 92 | 200 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,633 | 45 | 9 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS270516 IZOC SERVICOS DE INTERNET LTDA | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 3 | 80 | CAIDA |
| AS269684 LANFIBRA TELECOMUNICACOES - EIRELI | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 1 | 59 | CAIDA |
| AS264095 Saneamento de Goias S.A. | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 1 | 37 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.