AS267038 YES TELECOM TELECOMUNICAÇÕES LTDA 🇧🇷 BR
YES TELECOM TELECOMUNICAÃÃES LTDA. Announcing 12 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
5
1,536 (6 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
7
3 × /32
Upstreams
6
transit providers observed
Peers
3
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
1
transit customers observed
Customer cone
2
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS267038
- Name
- YES TELECOM TELECOMUNICAÇÕES LTDA
- Organisation
- M. V. MENEZES TELECOMUNICAÇÕES EIRELI - ME
- Country
- 🇧🇷 BR
- RIR
- LACNIC
- Allocated
- 2017-11-30
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 10-20Gbps
- Scope
- Not Disclosed
- Peering policy
- Open
- Website
- http://www.yestelecom.net.br
- PeeringDB
- net/18783
- Exchanges
- 1
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 55,267 | 236 | 148 | inferred |
| AS1031 PEER 1031 LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 34,437 | 0 | 8 | CAIDA |
| AS61832 Giga+ Empresas | 🇧🇷 BR | 20,652 | 38 | 25 | CAIDA |
| AS271253 LINK BRASIL TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA | 🇧🇷 BR | 847 | 15 | 107 | CAIDA |
| AS264556 Liberty Fibra | 🇧🇷 BR | 30 | 10 | 37 | CAIDA |
| AS272455 YES FIBRA INTERNET LTDA | 🇧🇷 BR | 3 | 0 | 8 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS35280 F5 Networks SARL | 🇫🇷 FR | 28,845 | 59 | 2 | CAIDA |
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | 🇧🇫 BF | 26,196 | 64 | 8 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 20,927 | 45 | 9 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS267593 TELLIUS TELECOMUNICACOES DAS AMERICAS LTDA | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 5 | 36 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.