AS267059 NETVIP MT πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR

Announcing 11 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
8
3,328 (13 Γ— /24)
IPv6 prefixes
3
2 Γ— /32
Upstreams
3
transit providers observed
Peers
2
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
12
transit customers observed
Customer cone
22
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS267059
Name
NETVIP MT
Organisation
NET VIP MT
Country
πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR
RIR
LACNIC
Allocated
2017-12-07
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Traffic levels
20-50Gbps
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Selective
IRR as-set
AS267059
PeeringDB
net/15513
Exchanges
2

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

10 valid (90.9%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 1 no ROA (9.1%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS53062 ACESSOLINE TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 20,907 92 2,337 CAIDA
AS262907 Brasil TecPar πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 233 534 1,122 CAIDA
AS266072 GLOBAL TELECOMUNICACOES EIRELI - ME πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 24 3 38 CAIDA

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS24482 SG.GS πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬ SG 20,891 45 53 CAIDA

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS270457 Edmilson Pereira da Silva MΓ‘quinas Me πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 7 10 732 CAIDA
AS265406 Web River Telecom πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 4 6 734 CAIDA
AS52626 NovaNet Provedor e Web Ltda πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 3 15 616 CAIDA
AS263129 Wavemax Internet πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 3 6 69 CAIDA
AS269111 Netlink Provedor πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 2 3 285 CAIDA
AS273801 Treinatec Telecom πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 2 0 150 CAIDA
AS265293 SPEEDMAX INTERNET FIBRA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 5 337 CAIDA
AS264168 ClickNet MatupΓ‘ πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 7 329 CAIDA
AS264924 MEGA PROVEDOR DE INTERNET LTDA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 5 266 CAIDA
AS269233 GDM INFORMATICA LTDA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 4 203 CAIDA
AS266946 Conecta Networks πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 5 170 inferred
AS268970 EXPERT INTERNET LTDA πŸ‡§πŸ‡· BR 0 4 46 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.