AS267158 MG NET TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA ME 🇧🇷 BR
MG NET TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA Â ME. Announcing 6 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
1
1,024 (4 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
5
2.3 × /32
Upstreams
5
transit providers observed
Peers
3
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
2
transit customers observed
Customer cone
3
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS267158
- Name
- MG NET TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA ME
- Organisation
- MG NET TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA ME
- Country
- 🇧🇷 BR
- RIR
- LACNIC
- Allocated
- 2018-01-22
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 10-20Gbps
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS267158:AS-MG
- PeeringDB
- net/28958
- Exchanges
- 1
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | 🇺🇸 US | 52,796 | 235 | 76 | inferred |
| AS52468 UFINET PANAMA S.A. | 🇵🇦 PA | 23,130 | 957 | 129 | CAIDA |
| AS270735 COMPUTIZE NETWORK TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA | 🇧🇷 BR | 657 | 2 | 83 | CAIDA |
| AS28202 Master Internet | 🇧🇷 BR | 157 | 1,132 | 142 | CAIDA |
| AS273478 Sage Networks | 🇧🇷 BR | 54 | 9 | 3 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS35280 F5 Networks SARL | 🇫🇷 FR | 21,592 | 59 | 7 | CAIDA |
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | 🇧🇫 BF | 21,462 | 64 | 7 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | 🇸🇬 SG | 4,641 | 45 | 16 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS52715 SCORPION TELECOMUNICAÇÃO RIBEIRÃO PRETO LTDA - ME | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 7 | 144 | CAIDA |
| AS266603 NEXT FIBRA | 🇧🇷 BR | 0 | 6 | 96 | CAIDA |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.