AS267318 SEEG FIBRAS π§π· BR
KMB CONSULTORIA & TELECOM EIRELI. Announcing 9 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
7
3,072 (12 Γ /24)
IPv6 prefixes
2
1.5 Γ /32
Upstreams
5
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
5
transit customers observed
Customer cone
20
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS267318
- Name
- SEEG FIBRAS
- Organisation
- KMB CONSULTORIA & TELECOM
- Country
- π§π· BR
- RIR
- LACNIC
- Allocated
- 2018-03-26
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Traffic levels
- 10-20Gbps
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- AS-267318
- Website
- https://seegfibras.com.br
- Looking glass
- https://seegfibras.com.br
- PeeringDB
- net/20995
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS1031 PEER 1031 LLC | πΊπΈ US | 31,736 | 0 | 89 | CAIDA |
| AS53062 ACESSOLINE TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA | π§π· BR | 20,870 | 92 | 266 | CAIDA |
| AS271253 LINK BRASIL TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA | π§π· BR | 865 | 15 | 264 | CAIDA |
| AS262907 Brasil TecPar | π§π· BR | 232 | 534 | 179 | CAIDA |
| AS264879 Supersoft InformΓ‘tica | π§π· BR | 125 | 3 | 48 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
No peers observed at the collectors.
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS263650 Clicfacil Telecom | π§π· BR | 9 | 17 | 19 | CAIDA |
| AS264010 Polli Telecom | π§π· BR | 5 | 16 | 134 | CAIDA |
| AS269037 SEEG SERVICOS E TECNOLOGIAS LTDA | π§π· BR | 3 | 3 | 159 | CAIDA |
| AS264308 RM INFORMATICA INTERNET LTDA | π§π· BR | 2 | 5 | 126 | CAIDA |
| AS262550 LUCAS NETWORK INFORMATICA LTDA ME | π§π· BR | 0 | 25 | 43 | inferred |
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.