AS267469 W8 Telecom Ltda - ME π§π· BR
Announcing 9 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.
IPv4 prefixes
5
2,048 (8 Γ /24)
IPv6 prefixes
4
1 Γ /32
Upstreams
7
transit providers observed
Peers
4
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
30
transit customers observed
Customer cone
116
ASes reachable through it
Registry and operator data
- AS number
- AS267469
- Name
- W8 Telecom Ltda - ME
- Organisation
- W8 Telecom
- Country
- π§π· BR
- RIR
- LACNIC
- Allocated
- 2017-08-11
- Network type
- NSP
- Traffic levels
- 200-300Gbps
- Scope
- Regional
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
- RADB::AS-W8TELECOM
- Website
- http://www.w8telecom.com.br
- Looking glass
- http://lg.w8telecom.com.br
- PeeringDB
- net/20190
- Exchanges
- 5
- Facilities
- 3
RPKI coverage of this AS
Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set
Upstreams
Networks seen providing transit to this one
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS3356 Lumen (Level 3) | πΊπΈ US | 71,974 | 2,069 | 2,543 | CAIDA |
| AS174 Cogent Communications, LLC | πΊπΈ US | 66,687 | 3,989 | 1,452 | CAIDA |
| AS13786 Seaborn (Seabras USA, LLC) | πΊπΈ US | 34,905 | 8 | 805 | CAIDA |
| AS7195 EdgeUno | π¨π΄ CO | 33,581 | 129 | 1,991 | CAIDA |
| AS8167 V.tal | π§π· BR | 20,341 | 899 | 4,148 | CAIDA |
| AS28329 SAMM (G8/Megatelecom) | π§π· BR | 1,068 | 26 | 143 | CAIDA |
| AS60503 FNX Tecnologia LTDA | π§π· BR | 464 | 17 | 265 | CAIDA |
Peers
Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit
| Network | Country | Cone | IPv4 prefixes | Paths | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS6939 Hurricane Electric LLC | πΊπΈ US | 54,932 | 237 | 1,614 | CAIDA |
| AS35280 F5 Networks SARL | π«π· FR | 29,230 | 59 | 21 | CAIDA |
| AS37721 Virtual Technologies & Solutions | π§π« BF | 24,569 | 64 | 34 | CAIDA |
| AS24482 SG.GS | πΈπ¬ SG | 19,413 | 45 | 154 | CAIDA |
Downstreams
Networks this one appears to provide transit to
Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.