AS267501 Equatorial Telecomunicações LTDA 🇧🇷 BR

Equatorial Telecomunicacoes LTDA. Announcing 23 prefixes, seen at the RIS collectors.

IPv4 prefixes
7
3,072 (12 × /24)
IPv6 prefixes
16
1.2 × /32
Upstreams
7
transit providers observed
Peers
0
settlement-free adjacencies
Downstreams
9
transit customers observed
Customer cone
100
ASes reachable through it

Registry and operator data

AS number
AS267501
Name
Equatorial Telecomunicações LTDA
Organisation
Equatorial Telecomunicações LTDA
Country
🇧🇷 BR
RIR
LACNIC
Allocated
2017-08-21
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Traffic levels
5-10Tbps
Scope
Regional
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
AS267501:AS-ALL
PeeringDB
net/18332
Exchanges
1

RPKI coverage of this AS

Its own announcements, validated against the current ROA set

23 valid (100.0%) 0 invalid (0.0%) 0 no ROA (0.0%)

Upstreams

Networks seen providing transit to this one

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS7738 V.tal (fka Telemar) 🇧🇷 BR 29,543 624 562 CAIDA
AS61832 Giga+ Empresas 🇧🇷 BR 20,415 38 68 inferred
AS269194 ST1 INTERNET 🇧🇷 BR 740 36 963 CAIDA
AS28598 MOB 🇧🇷 BR 421 82 416 CAIDA
AS273461 Atjp Corp 🇧🇷 BR 104 7 33 CAIDA
AS268214 CYBERWEB ATJP 🇧🇷 BR 102 4 13 CAIDA
AS265192 Nova MNet 🇧🇷 BR 10 5 6 inferred

Peers

Adjacencies that look settlement-free rather than transit

No peers observed at the collectors.

Downstreams

Networks this one appears to provide transit to

Network Country Cone IPv4 prefixes Paths Source
AS262663 METROFLEX TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA 🇧🇷 BR 52 96 78 CAIDA
AS270477 UFO TELECOM COMUNICAÇÃO DE MULTIMIDIA EIRELI 🇧🇷 BR 29 3 318 CAIDA
AS265171 SITELBRA LTDA 🇧🇷 BR 5 50 172 CAIDA
AS273333 ORIONNET TELECOM TECNOLOGIA E SERVI�OS 🇧🇷 BR 5 0 79 CAIDA
AS270350 RDS TECNOLOGIA-ME 🇧🇷 BR 5 8 77 CAIDA
AS263528 VIACOM NEXT GENERATION COMUNICACAO LTDA 🇧🇷 BR 0 5 255 CAIDA
AS53168 Equatorial Energia 🇧🇷 BR 0 7 109 CAIDA
AS267001 Tribunal de Contas do Estado do Maranhao 🇧🇷 BR 0 1 79 CAIDA
AS263889 Estado do Maranhao-Tribunal de Justica do Maranhao 🇧🇷 BR 0 1 32 CAIDA

Relationships marked inferred come from where the two networks sit on the AS paths the collectors see, which is a guess and is wrong for some of them. The rest are stated by CAIDA's published inference over a much wider set of collectors.